975 releases. 943 super hits. And the eight that did not land.

Every release, counted once

975 reviews on Fiverr since 2017.

• Super hitsFive stars943
• HitsFour stars24
• Three stars4
• Two stars2
• One star2

Fiverr profile, read on 23 October 2026. These reviews live on Fiverr, not on our server. We cannot edit one, delete one or move a bad one to the bottom. Four stars is a hit. We count the eight below it.

Filmito ist ein unabhängiges Studio und ein verifizierter Fiverr-Pro-Seller. Wir sind nicht mit Fiverr verbunden und werden von Fiverr weder unterstützt noch gesponsert. Fiverr ist eine Marke ihres Inhabers.

The releases that did not land

The eight, word for word.

In cinema there is a shorter word for a release that does not land. We will use it: these are our flops. Here they are, word for word, oldest first, with what each one changed in the way we work. Dates are as Fiverr showed them on 23 October 2026.

1. 01benhucker1853.3Australia5 years ago

   “Like the music and graphics added but the rest was over the top. Turned a 10 minute job into 5-day job. May have been my fault for not communicating needs better. Working with an average video in the first place so can't ask too much I guess.”

   What it changedA simple brief got more film than it asked for, and five days of back and forth is not a gift, it is a cost. More is not better. The brief decides the size of the work.
2. 02nimaris3Switzerland5 years ago

   “My experience with this offering wasn't the best one. After three attempts of me explaining pretty detailed what it is I need and where the problems in the current product I got are, there wasn't much progress and the problems remained unchanged. On top of that, most messages I got in return to my revision requests were pre-generated copy & paste texts that didn't really refer to my requests. It felt a lot like I was just an order number and that quantity comes before quality. I could've decided to ask for more revisions, but I don't feel like this would change much at this point. It's a bit of a shame, because the skills are absolutely there - just not the heart and soul for the project.”

   What it changedThree rounds of notes and the same problems each time means we were resending, not listening. Our reply at the time blamed the client. We would not write that reply today, and we have left it on Fiverr because it is part of the record.
3. 03jabarilindsay3.3Trinidad and Tobago5 years ago

   “I got what I wanted but it took a lot longer than expected, I'd have to wait an entire day to receive very small changes.”

   What it changedA day for a small change is a day the client spends waiting. We work from India and most of our clients do not. That gap is ours to manage, not theirs to absorb, and the first cut, the revision rounds and the delivery days are now public on the pricing page before anyone pays.
4. 04jessyantoine1.7United States1 year ago · 4 weeks

   “Not Sony quality like his experience says”

   What it changedThe Sony film is real and it is on this site. A credit is not a promise about the next film, and this client was right to judge the one in front of them. We ask every buyer to do the same: judge us on one ad.
5. 05sky18121United States1 year ago · 3 weeksOrder cancelled and refunded

   “Shivam is a complete scammer. He received a full brief and approved the order and delivery schedule. On the delivery day, he asked for three more extensions and then delivered what appears to be a video made in five minutes. He didn't follow my brief and used copyrighted material from a reference video. Total scam.”

   What it changedThe order was cancelled and refunded in full. We asked for more time because the film was not right yet; from the other side of the screen that looked like stalling, and we understand why. The footage was licensed. We read the brief differently from the client and we still believe the film was strong; both can be true. The word scammer stays on this page, because taking it down would be the only dishonest thing we could do with it.
6. 06jackogrady1572Ireland5 months ago · 13 days

   “Generic AI generated video. Not worth the price tag. Fair standard of video, but not worth a premium price.”

   What it changedHe was right, and we said so at the time. At our price the work has to feel considered and specific, and that film did not. A mid-stage review now sits inside every project, so the direction is judged before the final cut, not after.
7. 07david31713.3Israel3 months ago · 4 weeks

   “He is a leading expert in AI, and if I have less urgent projects in the future, I would certainly hire him; unfortunately, the issue was that it took a long time to get the materials across, though he ultimately handled it in the most professional manner possible.”

   What it changedA fair review of a slow project. The four weeks went into re-directing scenes until they were right, and we did not say so clearly enough while it was happening. Taking the time is a choice we stand by. Going quiet while we take it is not.
8. 08technopro611Madagascar2 months ago · 8 weeks

   “very long time to send the final video, and then he didn't even tell me he will finish, so I didn't have time to give any feedback on the final video, pretty bad experience for the price.”

   What it changedEight weeks, three full revisions, two changes of direction, and then the final arrived without warning, so the client had no time to answer before the order closed. That is on us. A final now comes with notice before it lands, and the door on that film is still open.

What eight people changed

How we work now, because of them.

1. You approve the script and the sound before a single frame is made.
2. A mid-stage review inside every project, so the direction is judged before the final cut, not after.
3. A final never arrives unannounced. You hear that it is coming first.
4. Every price, every revision round and every delivery day is public before you pay.